Developing LRU Fault Tools at Panasonic Avionics

9/21/2025

Bridging Hardware and Software ✈️💻

At Panasonic Avionics, I joined the software engineering team focused on improving how avionics technicians interact with Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) fault data. The challenge was simple to describe but complex to solve: take raw hardware faults buried deep in C++ logic and turn them into something clear, usable, and portable.


Connecting C++ to JavaScript

Faults originated in low-level C++ bindings, but technicians relied on a JavaScript-driven interface. I built the bridge that let fault data move cleanly between those layers.

  • Why this mattered: without the bridge, engineers had to rely on manual log inspection, which was slow and error-prone.
  • What I learned: careful design of the data interface ensured that technicians saw exactly what the hardware reported without unnecessary complexity.

This step was critical for real-time visibility: if an aircraft fault occurs, the data pipeline must be accurate and immediate.


Displaying & Exporting Faults

Once the data was accessible, my next task was to make it useful:

  • Display: I integrated the faults into the front-end interface so they could be filtered, sorted, and read at a glance. Clear visualization reduced misdiagnosis time and helped engineers act faster.

  • Export API: I designed an API that allowed faults to be exported as structured reports. This meant engineers could review data off-system or archive it for compliance.

  • Removable devices: I built detection logic for devices like USB drives so reports could be securely saved in the field.

  • Why this mattered: exporting transformed the interface from a reactive tool into a proactive workflow. Engineers no longer just saw faults — they could take them with them, share them, and plug them into larger analysis pipelines.


Full-Stack Problem Solving

The project required me to operate across the stack:

  • Systems programming: extending and interpreting C++ bindings safely.
  • Frontend integration: rendering live fault data with clarity and responsiveness.
  • Infrastructure: building APIs and device-handling logic that had to be resilient in constrained, safety-critical environments.

Each layer had its own challenges — from memory safety on the C++ side to state synchronization in the UI. Working end-to-end taught me to see how every engineering decision ripples through the system.


Takeaway ✨

This project sharpened my ability to bridge software with hardware workflows. By connecting low-level C++ logic to a modern JavaScript interface, designing APIs for exporting, and handling removable device logic, I learned how thoughtful engineering can shave hours off testing cycles and reduce real-world operational risk.

The broader lesson: good software isn’t just about making data visible — it’s about making it actionable. At Panasonic, I saw firsthand how bridging that gap can improve reliability and efficiency in mission-critical systems, and that’s the space I want to keep working in.